Push Chain Tokenomics

General Discussions
1

Now that the Push Chain DevNet is live—according to this thread on X

Can the team finally clarify the tokenomics?

After failing to provide a decent response to the critical concerns raised by @grasponcrypto, @nyhobo, @Daochemist, and myself in this post, the official announcement of DevNet going live only raises more concerns about whether the team, under @harshrajat’s leadership, is doing its due diligence.

If the team still has no clear idea of what the tokenomics will be at this stage, that’s highly alarming.

Adding to the concern:

  • The production launches of much larger chains that already achieve what Push Chain aims to build—and have a proven track record of successful rollouts.
  • The final epoch of the Push Incentives Program ends IN LESS THAN A WEEK, meaning that the 9,906,638 PUSH (Push Pool) + 5,960 UNI-V2 will soon be locked and rendered useless. Many will simply cut their losses and sell.

This is irresponsible and highlights a severe lack of competence. The team continues to avoid transparency, and the “project lead” is notably absent on such critical matters.

Once again, I leave the question here so there’s no excuse to ignore it:

Can the team finally clarify the tokenomics, @harshrajat?

2

Totally hear you. I am especially concerned about the yield staking program given that was the only thing providing any kind of liquidity for PUSH which is vitally important. It would make sense to extend this program until migration. It sounds like the tokenomics proposal is set to come out within February the last I heard and I am definitely crossing fingers that the existing PUSH holders who have taken all the pain (with a fresh new ATL today ha) will not in any way be diluted. I do believe it will be a true 1 to 1 migration adjusted for total supply but only time will tell. The good thing is that I don’t believe any PUSH holders will be down for any outcome other than same proportional ownership migration.

1 Like